fbpx

Measurement error

MSE

All measurements involve uncertainty. Suppliers of measuring equipment usually specify the measurement uncertainty as a symmetrical interval around the measurement result:

Measurement result ± measurement uncertainty

Example: The length of a special measuring rod is 2000 mm ± 1 mm. With a 95 % confidence interval, which is normal to use, there is a 95% probability that the rod is between 1999 mm and 2001 mm.

Measurement System Analysis (MSA), also referred to as Measurement System Evaluation (MSE), can determine the measurements accuracy, precision, and stability. By measuring the same item repeatedly you can decide the precision. 

Measurements are done many different ways, using different kind of technologies.

Lean Tech has evaluated subjective measurement systems like appearance, taste, and smell. Surprisingly, the measurement error for a visual test was greatest for the quality manager, who made the decision when there was doubt about the quality. The quality manager did not perform the test frequently, only occasionally when the quality was questioned. Ironically, this person's evaluation was less consistent than for operators who performed the test more frequently.

Maybe you use cameras / automatic optical inspection (AOI) to control product quality? The measurement can be performed based on reference points identified by the camera. Measures of distance can be made between reference points to control product quality. Measurement System Evaluations performed by Lean Tech for camera controls, show that they are both accurate and precise if they find the right reference point.

Unfortunately, they become unstable if they fail to find the correct reference point and thus render incorrect measurement. 

To make the right decisions, you need reliable measurement results. Lean Tech can help you perform Measurement System Analyzes or train you how to do it yourself.

Here is a video about weight measurements, which determine measurement uncertainty, within day variation and between day variation:

References

  • value stream mapping"I was very impressed with Sissel's Lean Six Sigma knowledge. She makes it easy to identify improvements and create results"
    - Daryl Powell, Research Manager, Sintef ManufacturingValue stream mapping
  • Lean engineering"Sissel has proven herself as a competent and committed employee. She has been an important contributor to make good progress in the projects she has worked with. At the same time she is accurate and has good quality of the work she performs."
    - Eivind Willoch, Project Manager, Cambi AS lean engineering
  • benchmarking"We are very happy with the work carried out. We was not very clear what the order was, but with your background and expertise the outcome was what we were looking for and a document we will benefit from in the future"
    - Roger Søråsdekkan, Site Leader at Allnex, Norwaybenchmarking
  • monitoring program"We hired Lean Tech to develop monitoring program for air emission. The assignment was delivered with the correct content at the right time. Recommended." monitoring program
    - Kjell Even Misfjord, SHE manager at Allnex, Norway  
  • monitoring program"Sissels ability to quickly understand the issue, as well as her commitment and expertise is impressive. Her analytical and thorough contribution to our monitoring program has been precise and targeted, and very educational. " monitoring program
    - Thomas Løvik, HSEQ advisor at TWMA, Norway
  • Joakim Holm Hansen"Very nice and professional service. Delivered a good job within deadlines" verdistrømsanalyse
    - Joakim Holm-Hansen, Plant Manager at Solenis, Norway
  • Feedback from course participants:
    "Inspiring, professionally competent, popularize a theoretical discipline."
    "Made a difference, engaged and skilled."
    "Academic highly skilled and clear performance. Fun and builds trust."
    lean six sigma kurs
}); })(jQuery);